Re: [jamboost] "Current" Boost.Jam state...

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-05 16:57:24

From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>

> So I was in the middle of trying out a patch to make1.c that Steve
Anichini
> sent me and I noticed that the latest CVS state of Boost.Jam is somewhat
> different in behaviour when used with Boost.Build V1. I remember there
where
> some changes regarding dependencies made that might not be backward
> compatible.
>
> Is this the case?

Not sure what you're asking here.
I don't think there were any changes other than possibly to the behavior of
extensions like FAIL_EXPECTED.

> And if it is... Are we planning on doing a new bjam release with 1.29.0
that
> uses the V1 build?
>
> Because as it stands, the "stage" target doesn't work. Or what are the
> changes so I can fix the stage target?

"cvs diff" is the best answer I can give you, sorry!

-----------------------------------------------------------
David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com