Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-05 16:57:24

From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>

> So I was in the middle of trying out a patch to make1.c that Steve
> sent me and I noticed that the latest CVS state of Boost.Jam is somewhat
> different in behaviour when used with Boost.Build V1. I remember there
> some changes regarding dependencies made that might not be backward
> compatible.
> Is this the case?

Not sure what you're asking here.
I don't think there were any changes other than possibly to the behavior of
extensions like FAIL_EXPECTED.

> And if it is... Are we planning on doing a new bjam release with 1.29.0
> uses the V1 build?
> Because as it stands, the "stage" target doesn't work. Or what are the
> changes so I can fix the stage target?

"cvs diff" is the best answer I can give you, sorry!

David Abrahams * Boost Consulting
dave_at_[hidden] *


Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at