Re: [boost] Re: stlport config patch and ???-stlport.jam tools

From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-05 21:08:55

[2002-07-20] Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

>2. In general current situation with stlport based toolsets seems
>unaceptable. Why do we need to repeat this work for every toolset: msvc,
>gcc, sunpro .... There exist some differencies but they are minimal. I am
>attaching of sunpro-stlport toolset definition that has stlport
>configurations factored out. I am gonna prepare docs for it and present for
>inclusion into tools/build. But I think that it worth considering that all
>stlport based tools use the same confoguration

Gennadiy did you ever submit the docs for this toolset? I was about to put
this into CVS but I can't find anything about docs from you.

Also where is the corresponding sunpro-tools.jam? (and sunpro-tools.html)

-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]