From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-08 23:03:14
[2002-08-08] Beman Dawes wrote:
>At 06:31 PM 8/8/2002, Rene Rivera wrote:
> >So the question is wether the gRUN_PATH is or isn't getting merged
> >correctly into the RUN_PATH?
> >Beman, what does the "PATH=" say in this faulty case?
>For reference, here is the borland set PATH, which works:
Thanks Beman... it's now fixed. As it turns out it was the flags line:
>> flags intel-win32 RUN_PATH : "$(INTEL_PATH)"\\Bin ;
Removing it make the PATH= magically reappear.
And Dave, the path to the libraries was already accounted for with a line
>> VC_STDLIB_PATH = "$(INTEL_PATH)"\\Bin ;
So now both that and the gRUN_PATH show correctly in the PATH=.
I love easy fixes :-)
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk