Re: [jamboost] Re: Targets in command line( Was: I'm back!)

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-10-16 03:07:15

Markus Schöpflin wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
> [snip]
> 
> 
>>I guess
>>
>> bjam dir1/foo.o
>>
>>is something rare, so we should not bother supporting it.
>>
> 
> 
> I use "bjam foo.o" (without the dir) quite frequently to look at the 
> result of preprocessing the file. 

Without the dir, this is quite common desire. I was merely saying that 
we might not bother to support this *with* dir.

> I have to add manually add compiler flags for this, of course...

Hmm... I guess some feature might be introduces specially for that. I'll
note this.

- Volodya