Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-05 14:14:09

Rene Rivera <grafik666_at_[hidden]> writes:

> [2003-01-05] David Abrahams wrote:
>>Rene Rivera <grafik666_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>> [2003-01-05] Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>>[2003-01-05] David Abrahams wrote:
>>>>>David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>>>> Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>>>>>> Would it be possible to change the default for testing.jam runs to
>>>>>> I did it that way so that people could put tests and regular targets
>>>>>> in the same Jamfile, and tests would not be built by default. It can
>>>>>> easily be overridden by sticking
>>>>>> DEPENDS all : test ;
>>>>>> In the Jamfile.
>>>>And this change just bit me :-( It turns out the date_time library has
>>> tests
>>>>in its build/Jamfile. Which now get run, and built, when doing a top
> level
>>> OK, never mind, it wasn't this change that caused the date_time tests to
>>> run. It's just that they are defined by the library :-( Perhaps someone
>>> should move those out of the regular build/Jamfile.
>>It shouldn't matter where they are. Test targets don't get built
>>unless explicitly requested.
> Found the problem. The date_time library is using "unit-test" rule to define
> some test in it's build/Jamfile. It also adds some number of examples that
> get built.

It's time to rip out the unit-test rule. Or, maybe we should just have
it dispatch to the run rule from testing.jam.

David Abrahams
dave_at_[hidden] *
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at