From: Aleksey Gurtovoy (alexy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-05-05 23:01:53
David Abrahams wrote:
> > As it appears from the log (which is also available from here -
> > http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/resources/bjam.log), the test
> > run was unsuccessful because bjam failed to find a dependent target
> > for _one_ of the libraries and just stopped the whole process!
> > That's definitely couldn't be the right behavior, could it?
> > We are trying hard to setup a reliable regression system which
> > regularly would require no human intervention, and everything being
> > broken on an erroneous check-in doesn't really fit into the scheme.
> No, it doesn't.
> > It would be appreciated if somebody clarified the situation.
> Could you add -d+5 at the beginning of the command-line and post the
> last hundred lines or so
> (or a link to) the resulting bjam.log?
Available here -
------_=_NextPart_000_01C31384.3A631A50 Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
[Attachment content not displayed.] ------_=_NextPart_000_01C31384.3A631A50--
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk