From: David Abrahams (gclbb-jamboost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-06-03 05:58:20
Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> writes:
> I just did an intel-win32 clean and then limits_test. It compiled, linked,
> and ran without error.
That's greate but doesn't tell me very much. It's just one test (with
one version?) of the compiler.
> >What does it mean that intel5,6 still report
> >BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP? I don't know what to do with
> >this information.
> Because # define BOOST_NO_ARGUMENT_DEPENDENT_LOOKUP is (or was, until I
> removed it) hardwired into intel.hpp when used with msvc?
I don't know; what does config_test say now?
I would think that config_test would not use the Boost config, but
then maybe I don't understand its purpose.
> Be careful about making changes at this point. AFAICS, the
> intel-win32-tools.jam and intel.hpp stuff is working far better than
> it ever has.
I'm not planning on doing anything else to it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk