From: David Abrahams (gclbb-jamboost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-28 09:10:28
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > David Abrahams wrote:
>> >> [Boost.Build guys, do we need to rename the BBv2 prerelease so this
>> >> confusion doesn't recur?]
>> > I'm not sure what you propose. V2 releases are called "Milestone X",
>> > which IMO, clearly indicates it's not yet 2.0-final.
>> Actually, on SF, they're just called "boost-build-mX",
> Actually, boost-build-2.0-mX
OK. "2.0" means pre-release to those in the know about BB, but will
confuse people just trying to get started with Boost.
>> which IMO doesn't clearly indicate prerelease status. Furthermore,
>> there's no reason a Milestone couldn't be a final release.
>> boost-build-v2aX would more-clearly indicate prerelease status.
> Does "a" stands for "alpha"?
> In my plans, we'd have a 2-3 more milestone
> releases and only then call V2 "alpha".
Even more reason to change the naming then.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk