From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-07-28 07:19:14
David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> >> [Boost.Build guys, do we need to rename the BBv2 prerelease so this
> >> confusion doesn't recur?]
> > I'm not sure what you propose. V2 releases are called "Milestone X",
> > which IMO, clearly indicates it's not yet 2.0-final.
> Actually, on SF, they're just called "boost-build-mX",
> which IMO
> doesn't clearly indicate prerelease status. Furthermore, there's no
> reason a Milestone couldn't be a final release. boost-build-v2aX
> would more-clearly indicate prerelease status.
Does "a" stands for "alpha"? In my plans, we'd have a 2-3 more milestone
releases and only then call V2 "alpha".
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk