From: Mark Sheppard (msheppard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-15 12:11:33
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Mark Sheppard wrote:
> > The backtrace was missing a frame....
> unfortunately, I cannot immediately understand what frame is
> missed, can you clarify.
> And what's confusing it that stacktrace is split in two part,
Ah, yes, the frame I thought it was missing is actually printed before the
error message. I've now altered my local version so it reports errors like
Jamtest(2) : argument error - missing argument `foo':
Jamtest(1) : rule four ( foo )
Jamtest(2) : called with: ( ) in three
Jamtest(3) : in two
Jamtest(4) : in one
Jamtest(5) : in module scope
Patch at http://188.8.131.52/jam/messages.patch if you're interested
(changes some other messages as well).
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk