From: brock_peabody (bpyama_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-17 13:26:49
--- In jamboost_at_[hidden], "Pedro Ferreira"
> IMHO a complete, thorough reference would be a waste of time or,
at least, a
> misuse of time.
I agree, especially since it's stil changing. A complete
enumeration of features would be good though.
> I think that a tool like bjam would be well served with:
> - For users:
> - a tutorial that covers major use-cases. The one that exists
> it just needs a bit more material;
> - a FAQ. I'm sure Volodya's notes would be a good start point;
> - a thorough set of examples/test cases that can serve as
That sounds good.
> - For developers:
> - a reasonable amount/quality of comments in the code. I think
> too bad as it is but could certainly be enhanced;
> - a good set of architecture documents.
> Another important point is the responsiveness of people in the
> IMO has been excellent, namely thanks to Volodya.
Absolutely. I feel bad about bugging him all the time, that's why I
brought this up :)
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk