Re: env vars, documentation (Was: [jamboost] environment variables)

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-20 02:18:41

brock_peabody wrote:

> > IMHO a complete, thorough reference would be a waste of time or,
>
> at least, a
>
> > misuse of time.
>
> I agree, especially since it's stil changing. A complete
> enumeration of features would be good though.

Sounds like a good idea. 

> > it just needs a bit more material;
> > - a FAQ. I'm sure Volodya's notes would be a good start point;
> > - a thorough set of examples/test cases that can serve as
>
> templates.
>
> That sounds good.

Ok. It would be great if users send doc suggestions. I might be possible that 
questions that hit the list (and which I'm going to collect soon) are just 
issues which users can't solve themself. I'd be interested in doc issues 
which users can resolve themself, and so don't report, but which still can be 
improved.

I'd really like the users to bring up doc issues and suggest what to be put in 
docs. 

> > Another important point is the responsiveness of people in the
>
> list, which
>
> > IMO has been excellent, namely thanks to Volodya.
>
> Absolutely. I feel bad about bugging him all the time, that's why I
> brought this up :)

No problem. I'll convert everything into docs, to point future users to ;-)

- Volodya