From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-21 00:30:34
Rene Rivera wrote:
> >It that works out, it would be great. As it stands, I'm not sure what to
> > do with the fixes and patches I've planned for today. Of course, I might
> > just store them locally as diffs until this situation is sorted out.
> I'm fairly sure that just prepending...
> rm -f `find v1 -name "*,v"`
> rm -f `find v2 -name "*,v"`
> ..to the script will work. But testing it would be preferable to blindly
> doing things to CVS.
> As for the tarball, I've done all I can do. I submitted a bug report to SF.
> Hopefully they can adjust the tarball process quickly.
Ok, looks like the problem might take some more time to resolve? Then, I'll
just go ahead an continue committing stuff to the current location. If the
next restructring script will use "rm -f", there should be no problem with my
checkings: they just will be copied.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk