From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-10-22 01:49:22
> > I recall Matt Armstrong has implemented something similiar for this
> > version of Perforce Jam. Is it primarily used for detecting where
> msvc is
> > installed?
> > I'm +/- 0 on this change, since we did not seen any complains from
> msvc users.
Per discussion which happened I agree that registry access would be good to
have. I've some questions about your patch, though:
1. If "PROFILE" a good name. It has strong connection for performance
measurements for me. In Matt's version it was called W32_GETREG. Maybe, some
better name could be invented.
2. What happens for REG_SZ value type?
3. You use _ltoa function. Isn't it msvc-specific. If so, printf would be a
4. Finally, it seems like you profile.win32.c file has tabs. While Perforce
Jam has them, it think it's better to avoid tabs in a new file.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk