Re: [jamboost] Registry access

From: PAL (b84037_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-11-07 16:11:06

> I'm about to apply your patch which adds builtin for registry access, and
have
> two questions:
>
> 1. What would be the better name for builtin? What do you think about
> W32_GETREG, for example. That's the name used in the other
implementation,
> so it probably good idea to use the same name.
>
> 2. The filename of 'profile.win32.c' has two dots, and I believe it's
agaist
> boost standards. What about renaming it to something? E.g. w32_getreg.c?
>
> Could you send the patch after addressing those points?
>
> 3. It would be nice if you could write a small paragraph descriting the
new
> builtin -- which I can add to docs. Of course, if you're out of time or
don't
> have the inclination to write docs, I'll commit the patch anyway.
>
OK, but I will have four day's travel from now on.
So I will do it after I return.