From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-12-29 08:55:03
I just started browsing through the v2 docs. I have to say that
they're very nice and accessible so far. They give a very reassuring
sense of security!
When I saw the mention of <library> at
I started to wonder why not <source> instead?
If you can write:
: requirements <library>/boost/filesystem//fs
Then why not also
: requirements <source>foo.cpp
and then why not
: requirements <source>/boost/filesystem//fs
; # ^^^^^^^^
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk