From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-16 04:20:30
as you probably remember, some time ago I've implemented proper library
ordering for gcc. The only problem was that it increased running time by an
order of magnitude for JÃ¼rgen.
I've just comitted a couple of patches which fix that. JÃ¼rgen reports that now
library ordering does not affect performance.
Also, the library ordering is now done for "sun" toolset, since prior
discussion revealed sun linker is sensitive to library order as well.
I would appreciate if folks who had problems with library order previously try
the current CVS state. It would be necessary to rebuilt bjam, also.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk