Re: [jamboost] Library ordering, try 2

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-02-16 15:15:48

At Monday 2004-02-16 02:20, you wrote:

>Hi,
>as you probably remember, some time ago I've implemented proper library
>ordering for gcc. The only problem was that it increased running time by an
>order of magnitude for Jürgen.
>
>I've just comitted a couple of patches which fix that. Jürgen reports 
>that now
>library ordering does not affect performance.
>
>Also, the library ordering is now done for "sun" toolset, since prior
>discussion revealed sun linker is sensitive to library order as well.
>
>I would appreciate if folks who had problems with library order previously 
>try
>the current CVS state. It would be necessary to rebuilt bjam, also.

given that we have a build system, it would be nice if things that needed 
being rebuild got rebuilt automatically, like the rest of boost.

I have a scheduled task that runs daily at 0300 my time which does (among 
other things)
cd to my boost source location then:

cvs -z9 update -A -P -d >> update.log
bjam -sTOOLS=vc7.1 install >bjaminstall.log
cd status
bjam -sTOOLS=vc7.1 >status.log

I try to check the output of the logs daily.
if this does NOT build the new jam, shouldn't it?

...
I also try
bjam --v2
in both directories

if this is insufficient to rebuild bjam, what commands DO I need to add to 
my daily testing?

>- Volodya
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"