From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-24 03:49:13
> > I think I've fixed the second and the third problem with the attached
> > patch. It's very dirty and there are no regression tests yet, so I
> > can't commit it today. However, if you could test with it applied,
> > that would be great.
> Done this. Works fine now.
And I've comitted clean up patch and a test.
> > As for the first issue, I'm not 100% sure. I kinda expected that
> > stage rule would be located in top-level, as opposed to in each
> > Jamfile, so I can't suggest a solution off-hand.
> Don't hurry. I'm far from using Boost.Build as our main build system.
Is performance still the primary blocker?
> To be frank, I never thought about putting the stage in top-level
> Jamfile. Seems like I should rework my Jamfiles again ;-)
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk