Re: [jamboost] [V2] problems with build-project

From: Jürgen Hunold (hunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-06-24 04:02:49

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Volodya !

On Thursday 24 June 2004 10:49, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,

> And I've comitted clean up patch and a test.

Thanks !

> > > As for the first issue, I'm not 100% sure. I kinda expected that
> > > stage rule would be located in top-level, as opposed to in each
> > > Jamfile, so I can't suggest a solution off-hand.
> >
> > Don't hurry. I'm far from using Boost.Build as our main build
> > system.
>
> Is performance still the primary blocker?

Mainly, yes. 
With better performance I could get at least one of my colleagues to use 
Boost.Build, whereas convining the rest is another matter ;-)
Some of them are hard-core MS-Developer Studio addicts ;-)

> > To be frank, I never thought about putting the stage in top-level
> > Jamfile. Seems like I should rework my Jamfiles again ;-)
> >
> :-)

Yours, 

Jürgen

- -- 
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Institut für Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau
* voice: ++49 511 762-2529 ! und -betrieb, Universität Hannover  
* fax : ++49 511 762-3001 ! Appelstrasse 9a, D-30167 Hannover
* hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ive.uni-hannover.de
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFA2pi8ljbJ/LLrxrYRAnvaAJ4gyxd8VZVXhknuKe7YG8g7+GmIEACdEyJJ
lwR5ojiLgoQZ/qp3crO8OIM=
=ZRg/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----