From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-04 15:08:00
David Abrahams wrote:
>"Reece Dunn" <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > David Abrahams wrote:
> >>"Reece Dunn" <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> > I have written a Metrowerks CodeWarrior toolset. It has not been
> >> > tested (debug, library/archive builds, etc.).
> >> >
> >> > Q: Are there any plans for a workaround for response files on
> >> > GCC since they don't support them?
> >>Metrowerks certainly does support response files.
> > Is that for CW 8+ because I am using CW 6.1 and can't find any
> > about them.
>CW 7+. I think supporting CW6 should be declared beyond our scope,
>but I guess you're using it.
Thanks. CW6 has some issues with iterator adaptors (boost::reverse_iterator)
but as I am relatively new to the CW tools I haven't had the chance to sort
though this, although since CW6 is an old compiler I'm not too worried about
>You realize they're up to 9, now?
I am aware of this. But supporting many compilers is expensive business! I
guess that's what a compile farm is for :).
It's fast, it's easy and it's free. Get MSN Messenger today!
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk