Re: CodeWarrior support in V2

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-04 15:57:32

"Reece Dunn" <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> writes:

>>CW 7+. I think supporting CW6 should be declared beyond our scope,
>>but I guess you're using it.
>
> Thanks. CW6 has some issues with iterator adaptors
> (boost::reverse_iterator) but as I am relatively new to the CW tools
> I haven't had the chance to sort though this, although since CW6 is
> an old compiler I'm not too worried about this.

I don't understand; now it sounds like you don't care too much about
the old version -- or is it reverse_iterator that you don't care
about?

>>You realize they're up to 9, now?
>
> I am aware of this. But supporting many compilers is expensive
> business! 

As is supporting old ones. Why not upgrade?

> I guess that's what a compile farm is for :).

Or a compiler graveyard ;->

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com