From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-07-04 15:57:32
"Reece Dunn" <msclrhd_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>CW 7+. I think supporting CW6 should be declared beyond our scope,
>>but I guess you're using it.
> Thanks. CW6 has some issues with iterator adaptors
> (boost::reverse_iterator) but as I am relatively new to the CW tools
> I haven't had the chance to sort though this, although since CW6 is
> an old compiler I'm not too worried about this.
I don't understand; now it sounds like you don't care too much about
the old version -- or is it reverse_iterator that you don't care
>>You realize they're up to 9, now?
> I am aware of this. But supporting many compilers is expensive
As is supporting old ones. Why not upgrade?
> I guess that's what a compile farm is for :).
Or a compiler graveyard ;->
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk