From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-06 07:54:18
David Abrahams wrote:
> > 1. The build directory is still used, in my proposal. That is, targets
> > are placed in "bin", not in ".".
> That's why it says "subdirectory"
> > 2. How do we specify that we want some specific property in path. E.g.
> > exe foo : foo.cpp : <relevant-feature>doc-format ;
> > The <build-subdirectory> does not sound good in that context.
> Why not?
Just because it feels that there's one 'build-subdirectory', so something with
looks strange to me
> I'm warming to relevant-feature a bit, but it's still obtuse.
Well, it has the smell of implementation detail :-(
> I know
> I came up with the term, but I never expected it to be in a prominent
> place in the system's UI.
Seems we need something in UI... maybe <represent-feature> or <track-feature>,
or <show-feature-value> or <encode-feature-value> or <show-in-target-path>?
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk