Re: best alternative

From: Konstantin Litvinenko (darkangel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-10-13 02:14:40

Hello, Vladimir!
You wrote on Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:04:15 +0400:

VP> I don't understand you. That was the first thing I've suggested and you
VP> said it did not work. Now you say it does. So, what is the case?

That because I was talking about test case not my project. If I do this
replacement in my project that doesn't help, but it is another history.

VP> Thanks. The problem is exactly with <toolset>borland-6.4, that is
VP> specific version there. This is more or less known (comments in code
VP> explicitly mention this case), but maybe it can be fixed quickly.

VP> Can you go to targets.jam, method basic-target.match and see if
VP> processing 'condition' with 'feature.expand-subfeatures' fixes your
VP> problem?

Hm, it does help.

With best regards, Konstantin Litvinenko. E-mail: darkangel_at_[hidden]