Re: [jamboost] [Q] Is this a documentation problem or have I missed something (again)?

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-23 03:09:09

On Monday 22 November 2004 23:59, Michael Peterson wrote:

> Instead, I get the following:
>
> michael ~/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2> bjam --version
> /home/michael/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2/build/toolset.jam:29: in
> using *** argument error
> * rule stlport.init ( version ? : headers libraries ? )
> * called with: ( : /usr/local/include/stlport : /usr/local/lib/stlport
>
> : : : : : )
>
> * extra argument /usr/local/lib/stlport
> /home/michael/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2/tools/stlport.jam:183:see
> definition of rule 'init' being called
> /home/michael/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2/user-config.jam:44: in
> modules.load

The 1.32 tarball that I've downloaded does not have any initialisation of 
stlport there. All initializations are commented out. Maybe, you somehow have 
an old copy of that file?

- Volodya