Re: [Q] Is this a documentation problem or have I missed something (again)?

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-24 10:26:09

Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Monday 22 November 2004 23:59, Michael Peterson wrote:
>
>
>> Instead, I get the following:
>>
>> michael ~/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2> bjam --version
>> /home/michael/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2/build/toolset.jam:29: in
>> using *** argument error
>> * rule stlport.init ( version ? : headers libraries ? )
>> * called with: ( : /usr/local/include/stlport : /usr/local/lib/stlport
>>
>> : : : : : )
>>
>> * extra argument /usr/local/lib/stlport
>> /home/michael/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2/tools/stlport.jam:183:see
>> definition of rule 'init' being called
>> /home/michael/sde/boost_1_32_0/tools/build/v2/user-config.jam:44: in
>> modules.load
>
> The 1.32 tarball that I've downloaded does not have any initialisation of 
> stlport there. All initializations are commented out. Maybe, you somehow have 
> an old copy of that file?

Or perhaps a user-config.jam or site-config.jam where it's invoked?

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com