From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 08:51:04
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Sunday 28 November 2004 12:58, Daniel James wrote:
>>I don't think it currently offers any real advantage
>>over just using it straight from the source so it might be best to just
>>remove the package.
> It would still be move convenient to
> apt-get install boost-build
> then doing manual unpacking.
Yes certainly, I just meant for the original poster, since he's already
unpacked it. It will be great if the build instructions for a
boost-build package will just be: 'apt-get install boost-build && bjam'.
Thanks for doing this, as a Debian user I really appreciate it.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk