Re: bbv2-m10: 'extra argument g++-3.2' error

From: gmu (usrlocalinfo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2004-11-29 11:22:01

Daniel James wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> 
>>On Sunday 28 November 2004 12:58, Daniel James wrote:
>>
>>>I don't think it currently offers any real advantage 
>>>over just using it straight from the source so it might be best to just
>>>remove the package.
>>
>>It would still be move convenient to 
>>
>> apt-get install boost-build
>>
>>then doing manual unpacking.
> 
> 
> Yes certainly, I just meant for the original poster, since he's already 
> unpacked it. It will be great if the build instructions for a 
> boost-build package will just be: 'apt-get install boost-build && bjam'.
> 
> Thanks for doing this, as a Debian user I really appreciate it.
> 
> Daniel
> 

I agree.

I really love having the debian subdirectory available. It lets me 
download bbv2, modify a couple things if desired, build a debian package 
and deploy on multiple machines with minimal hassle.

If there was a stable/testing/unstable package for boost-build v2, then 
this wouldn't matter as much but for now, it is very much appreciated.