From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-20 09:55:21
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 18:45, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > That's kind of inconvenient
> Yea, very :--(
> > via Samba. Maybe, we should switch to using symlinks?
> Well since it's the bjam build, we can probably just remove the extra
> builds and only have bjam(.exe) built.
That would be reasonable. After all, I don't think anybody of us cares about
classic-Jam compatible mode.
> But ti does mean that the install will also fail, at least for BBv1.
> Does BBv2 install use symlinks or hardlinks?
You mean, for versioned libraries? Symlinks.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk