Re: [jamboost] Re: Jam on cygwin build problem

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-20 09:55:21

On Wednesday 20 April 2005 18:45, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > That's kind of inconvenient
>
> Yea, very :--(
>
> > via Samba. Maybe, we should switch to using symlinks?
>
> Well since it's the bjam build, we can probably just remove the extra
> builds and only have bjam(.exe) built.

That would be reasonable. After all, I don't think anybody of us cares about 
classic-Jam compatible mode.

> But ti does mean that the install will also fail, at least for BBv1.
> Does BBv2 install use symlinks or hardlinks?

You mean, for versioned libraries? Symlinks.

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2