Re: [jamboost] Re: Jam on cygwin build problem

From: Rene Rivera (grafik.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-04-20 10:05:26

Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 April 2005 18:45, Rene Rivera wrote:
> 
>>Well since it's the bjam build, we can probably just remove the extra
>>builds and only have bjam(.exe) built.
> 
> That would be reasonable. After all, I don't think anybody of us cares about 
> classic-Jam compatible mode.

OK, will do then.

>>But ti does mean that the install will also fail, at least for BBv1.
>>Does BBv2 install use symlinks or hardlinks?
> 
> You mean, for versioned libraries? Symlinks.

Yes, and for the various versioned/unversioned/undecorated names the 
BBv1 install creates for a single library.

-- 
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - Grafik/jabber.org