From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 05:09:39
> Since the Boost Jam build produces a binary called "bjam"
> and not "jam", should the "usage" message reflect this?
That might produce output like:
usage: bin.linuxx86/bjam [ options ] targets...
is the path desired? Maybe, we should just hardcode "bjam", as we don't
care much about classic Jam compatibility, and "jam" binary is no longer built
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk