Boost logo

Boost-Build :

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 05:09:39

Hi Craig,

> Since the Boost Jam build produces a binary called "bjam"
> and not "jam", should the "usage" message reflect this?

That might produce output like:

usage: bin.linuxx86/bjam [ options ] targets...

is the path desired? Maybe, we should just hardcode "bjam", as we don't
care much about classic Jam compatibility, and "jam" binary is no longer built
by default.

- Volodya

Vladimir Prus
Boost.Build V2:

Boost-Build list run by bdawes at, david.abrahams at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at