From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 06:32:52
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> Hi Craig,
>> Since the Boost Jam build produces a binary called "bjam"
>> and not "jam", should the "usage" message reflect this?
> That might produce output like:
> usage: bin.linuxx86/bjam [ options ] targets...
> is the path desired? Maybe, we should just hardcode "bjam", as we don't
> care much about classic Jam compatibility, and "jam" binary is no longer built
> by default.
It's standard practice in the UNIX world to reflect the actual 0th
argument rather than hardcoding the name IIUC.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk