From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-08 10:18:28
David Abrahams wrote:
> Andrey Melnikov <melnikov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>>On Wednesday 06 July 2005 18:39, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>>* --clean; Remove the named targets
>>>>* -a; Rebuild everything
>>>>* -n; Don't execute the command, only print them
>>>>* -d+2; Show all executed commands
>>>>* -q; Stop at first error
>>For me your variant looks like I should use both -n -d+2 to get more
> I can't imagine how you draw that conclusion. The only thing I'd
> change is to replace "the command, only" with "the commands; only"
>>I mean that I understood like with -n without -d+2 some commands
>>will be won't be displayed.
> That is unparseable. Care to try again?
Sorry for my English. One more try:
* -n Don't execute commands, only print them
* -d+2 Show executed commands
I removed "all".
With "all" it looked for me similar to /Wall "show all warnings" option
of many C compilers. Without /Wall some warnings aren't displayed.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk