Re: [jamboost] Re: --help-options / --help-usage

From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-08 10:18:28

David Abrahams wrote:
> Andrey Melnikov <melnikov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>Vladimir Prus wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday 06 July 2005 18:39, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Important Options:
>>>>
>>>>* --clean; Remove the named targets
>>>>* -a; Rebuild everything
>>>>* -n; Don't execute the command, only print them
>>>>* -d+2; Show all executed commands
>>>>* -q; Stop at first error
>>
>>For me your variant looks like I should use both -n -d+2 to get more 
>>verbosity. 
> 
> 
> I can't imagine how you draw that conclusion. The only thing I'd
> change is to replace "the command, only" with "the commands; only"
> 
> 
>>I mean that I understood like with -n without -d+2 some commands
>>will be won't be displayed.
> 
> 
> That is unparseable. Care to try again?
>
Sorry for my English. One more try:

* -n Don't execute commands, only print them
* -d+2 Show executed commands

I removed "all".

With "all" it looked for me similar to /Wall "show all warnings" option 
of many C compilers. Without /Wall some warnings aren't displayed.

Andrey