From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-08 10:39:10
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Thursday 07 July 2005 17:35, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > Either we need to decide that <include> should be treated relative
>> > to source location, and not Jamfile location (no opinion yet),
>> Until we get a clear definition of the term "source location," I'm
>> strongly against it!
>> After we get a definition, I'm probably still against it, but it's
>> hard to say without knowing what it means. ;-)
> "source location" is a directory that all file references in Jamfile are
> relative too.
> project : source-location foo ;
> exe a : a.cpp ;
> Here, 'a.cpp' is looked up in directory <Jamfile-dir>/foo
> Does this make it clear?
Yes, thanks. In that case, I'm for it!
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk