From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-23 04:26:11
On Friday 22 July 2005 20:53, David Abrahams wrote:
> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > And no, using SF patch facility is a 100% sure way to get your patch
> > ignored, because that's extremely inconvenient.
> I can't understand this reaction. If the patch gets sent to the list
> anyway, why is that any more inconvenient for you?
Is it sent to the list? I think that patch itself is not included in email, so
I need to go to SF page, download the patch, and then don't forget to mark it
as resolved in the tracker. That's too much churn both for me *and* for
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk