From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-07-25 08:42:23
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Friday 22 July 2005 20:53, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > And no, using SF patch facility is a 100% sure way to get your patch
>> > ignored, because that's extremely inconvenient.
>> I can't understand this reaction. If the patch gets sent to the list
>> anyway, why is that any more inconvenient for you?
> Is it sent to the list?
If it isn't currently, we should arrange it. We have that for all the
> I think that patch itself is not included in email, so I need to go
> to SF page, download the patch, and then don't forget to mark it as
> resolved in the tracker. That's too much churn both for me *and* for
Yet you have no problem with
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk