From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-08-16 10:17:07
Rene Rivera wrote:
> Andrey Melnikov wrote:
>>David Abrahams wrote:
>>>installer gives you the option to *not* set up the environment, so I'd
>>>think the registry would be the more reliable of the two.
>>I thought that if you don't setup the environment the installer just
>>doesn't setup INCLUDE/LIB persistently. IMO VS*COMNTOOLS is always set up.
> And VC8 doesn't seem to set up anything
> at all.
VC8 June CTP and Beta2 set up VS80COMNTOOLS. I'll check this later when
I get my VS DVD back. I lent my DVD-RW to a friend and forgot to take
the disk out of the drive.
> And regardless there are other Windows compilers than VC which
> use the registry instead of the env, like CW.
Do you mean compilers, or toolsets here? I can see that CW uses cwenv.bat.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk