Re: [jamboost] Qt: moccing of cpp sources

From: Jürgen Hunold (hunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-08 05:29:18

Hi Volodya !

On Dunnersdag 08 September 2005, 12:13, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Hi Jürgen,

> > The name then will be "main.moc", I hope ?
>
> No, "main_moc.cpp" at the moment.

Well, then you can't compile qt4 ;-))

> > Well, please take a look a TrollTechs documents at
> >
> > http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/moc.html

> Yes, that makes sense.

Please don't forget to add the link to the "rationale" section of the docs for 
qt4.jam. I think this prevents many questions ;-)

> > On the other I know that the KDE project _always_ #includes the mocced
> > files in order to get some speed improvements.
>
> Hmm... in fact I don't know if I can have .cpp files mocced with current
> KDE build system, so I always put Q_OBJECT classes to headers.

Well, I've this thing reported by my colleague. But nevermind...

> > But they are switching to Scons at the moment...
>
> Are they? I haven't see any news about this on KDE mailing lists.

Well, according to my colleague this was discussed and probably decided at the 
KDE Academy 2005 meeting in Malaga last week. 
He's working on cervisia and said that the first Scons files appear in the 
repository right now.

> Okay, I'll first make the qmake-compatible way work, and then wait if
> somebody requests a switch.

Great.
I thinkt I get spent some time on testing and commenting from September, 19 
on.

Yours,

Jürgen

-- 
* Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Institut für Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau
* voice: ++49 511 762-2529 ! und -betrieb, Universität Hannover 
* fax : ++49 511 762-3001 ! Appelstrasse 9a, D-30167 Hannover
* hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ive.uni-hannover.de