Re: [jamboost] Qt: moccing of cpp sources

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-13 06:12:08

Hi Jürgen,

> On Dunnersdag 08 September 2005, 12:13, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Hi Jürgen,
> >
> > > The name then will be "main.moc", I hope ?
> >
> > No, "main_moc.cpp" at the moment.
>
> Well, then you can't compile qt4 ;-))

Ok, now the name is "main.moc".

> > > Well, please take a look a TrollTechs documents at
> > >
> > > http://doc.trolltech.com/4.0/moc.html
> >
> > Yes, that makes sense.
>
> Please don't forget to add the link to the "rationale" section of the docs
> for qt4.jam. I think this prevents many questions ;-)

Done.

> > > On the other I know that the KDE project _always_ #includes the mocced
> > > files in order to get some speed improvements.
> >
> > Hmm... in fact I don't know if I can have .cpp files mocced with current
> > KDE build system, so I always put Q_OBJECT classes to headers.
>
> Well, I've this thing reported by my colleague. But nevermind...
>
> > > But they are switching to Scons at the moment...
> >
> > Are they? I haven't see any news about this on KDE mailing lists.
>
> Well, according to my colleague this was discussed and probably decided at
> the KDE Academy 2005 meeting in Malaga last week.
> He's working on cervisia and said that the first Scons files appear in the
> repository right now.

Ehm... indeed. It looks like a couple of developers made SCons setup for KDE,
and the question which system to use did not really arise (at least 
Boost.Build was not considered at all).

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2