Re: [jamboost] Re: [BBv2 docs editorial] Installation

From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 10:23:58

On Thursday 22 September 2005 17:45, David Abrahams wrote:
> Andrey Melnikov <melnikov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > If the general idea is good, what about this:
> >
> > -------
> >
> > If your platform isn't in the list, or if you
> > downloaded the latest Boost beta sources from CVS instead of an
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> I prefer "are using a copy of the Boost sources that is still under
> active development," since this does not only apply to "beta" and it
> does not only apply to "the latest" and because a development state
> of the sources may have been acquired other than through CVS,
> e.g. from some administrator that did the CVS and then produced a
> tarball, and because we're going to switch off of CVS soon anyway.

What about "or if you're using in-development version", then?

- Volodya

-- 
Vladimir Prus
http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com
Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2