From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-09-22 10:37:31
Vladimir Prus <ghost_at_[hidden]> writes:
> On Thursday 22 September 2005 17:45, David Abrahams wrote:
>> Andrey Melnikov <melnikov_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> > If the general idea is good, what about this:
>> > -------
>> > If your platform isn't in the list, or if you
>> > downloaded the latest Boost beta sources from CVS instead of an
>> I prefer "are using a copy of the Boost sources that is still under
>> active development," since this does not only apply to "beta" and it
>> does not only apply to "the latest" and because a development state
>> of the sources may have been acquired other than through CVS,
>> e.g. from some administrator that did the CVS and then produced a
>> tarball, and because we're going to switch off of CVS soon anyway.
> What about "or if you're using in-development version", then?
You need to indicate a development version of _what_.
"or if you are using a development version of the Boost Sources"
would be fine.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk