From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-10-20 03:18:54
On Wednesday 19 October 2005 20:09, Reece Dunn wrote:
> Alexey Pakhunov <alexeypa <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > Reece Dunn wrote:
> > > + # sh
> > > + sh3 sh3dsp sh4 sh5
> > Can these shXxx be expressed via combinations of <architecture>sh and
> > different <address-model> and <instruction-set>?
> I was considering that, but we have mips1, mips2, mips3, etc. so I was
> being consistent :).
This only adds to my confusion about <architecture> and <instruction-set>
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk