From: Jim Douglas (jim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-14 03:44:19
Jim Douglas wrote:
> Overall, if we can achieve the same capabilities as bbv1 for v1.34 I
> will be happy - anything extra will be a bonus. My main concern is that
> we start off down a road that will allow us to develop the potential
> offered by QNX. IMHO a quick port of v1 would not give us that flexibility.
> What is the best way forward?
Shall I write a specification for qcc.jam and post it into the tracker
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk