Re: [Boost-build] V2/1.34: next steps

From: Reece Dunn (msclrhd_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-02-14 03:48:18

Jim Douglas wrote:
>Jim Douglas wrote:
> > Overall, if we can achieve the same capabilities as bbv1 for v1.34 I
> > will be happy - anything extra will be a bonus. My main concern is that
> > we start off down a road that will allow us to develop the potential
> > offered by QNX. IMHO a quick port of v1 would not give us that 
>flexibility.
> >
> > What is the best way forward?
>
>Shall I write a specification for qcc.jam and post it into the tracker
>system?

There is already an entry for the qcc toolset, so it would make sense to add 
it there.

- Reece