From: Jürgen Hunold (hunold_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-10 04:53:26
On Friday 10 March 2006 08:30, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Essentially, the idea is to assume <warnings>on is the common setting, and
> really use maximum warning level for <warnings>all.
> Is this fine with everybody? Note that the question if we should pass no
> warning option unless user gave explicit value for <warnings> is a separate
> one, and can be decided separately.
+1 from me for <warnings>on.
-- * Dipl.-Math. Jürgen Hunold ! Ingenieurgesellschaft für * voice: ++49 511 262926 57 ! Verkehrs- und Eisenbahnwesen mbH * fax : ++49 511 262926 99 ! Lister Straße 15 * hunold_at_[hidden] ! www.ive-mbh.de
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk