From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-03-10 06:30:31
On Friday 10 March 2006 12:53, Jürgen Hunold wrote:
> Hi !
> On Friday 10 March 2006 08:30, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Essentially, the idea is to assume <warnings>on is the common setting,
> > and really use maximum warning level for <warnings>all.
> > Is this fine with everybody? Note that the question if we should pass no
> > warning option unless user gave explicit value for <warnings> is a
> > separate one, and can be decided separately.
> +1 from me for <warnings>on.
This is comitted. Hope this will bring the number of warnings on regression
tests down to reasonable levels.
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk