From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-12 03:06:42
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 03:22, Eric Niebler wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
> > Rene Rivera wrote:
> >> Eric Niebler wrote:
> >>> Rene, it looks like this has something to do with the change you made
> >>> to the jam build location. Can you take a look?
> >> I think it's a change Volodya made to include the bjam docs inside the
> >> BBv2 docs. The bjam docs have been working on the new location for some
> >> time now. Not sure the change Volodya did is though.
> > Ah. I see. We need to add some references to $BOOST_ROOT/doc/Jamfile.v2.
> > The following two seem to do the trick:
> > <dependency>../tools/build/v2/doc//jam_docs
> > <implicit-dependency>../tools/build/v2/doc//jam_docs
> > Volodya, does this change need to be applied to the RC branch, too?
> I take it back, that's not quite right. I'm now getting heaps of
> warnings like:
> ../bin.v2/doc/msvc-7.1/debug/boost.docbook:68073: element section:
> validity error : ID jam.intro already defined
> Clearly, including the Jam documentation twice was a bad idea. Volodya?
Hmm... we still need some way to include jam docs into Boost.Build standalone
Anybody knows any way to do conditional xi:include, so that I can set some
parameter when building standlone Boost.Build docs? If no, I'll modify
Boost.Build nightly build script to patch docs to add include of jam docs.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk