From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-25 11:59:55
On Tuesday 25 April 2006 19:55, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Mark Evans wrote:
> > Thanks Vladimir,
> >> From my limited perspective, it appears that a glob that recurses
> >> through a tree (that I would call FIND-GLOB) would best be
> >> implemented through a new builtin primitive. Would you agree?
> >> Semi-ironically, there already is a GLOB-RECURSIVELY built-in, but
> >> it doesn't recurse the tree as needed.
> Well it might be better to make the functionality match the name. So
> what is the difference between GLOB and GLOB-RECURSIVELY (as currently
The latter handles a/*/b/*.cpp fine. The former can glob only in one
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk