From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-04-26 04:30:27
On Saturday 15 April 2006 13:09, Reece Dunn wrote:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > como-win.jam seems to be using a nonexistent common.response-file rule.
> > c:/boost/tools/build/v2/tools\como-win.jam:93: in como-win.link
> > rule common.response-file unknown in module como-win.
> > What's going on with that?
> Origionally, that rule was used to create a response file for passing
> defines and includes to the compiler. It has since been replaced by the
> @(...)-style bjam syntax.
> commo-win was left out of the conversion. Sigh. No-one, apart from you,
> have reported this issue and hte new feature has been in place for a while
Fixed in CVS. At least, I can build the 'hello' example with como-win.
-- Vladimir Prus http://vladimir_prus.blogspot.com Boost.Build V2: http://boost.org/boost-build2
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk