From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2006-08-02 14:32:03
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> On Saturday 29 July 2006 15:31, Roland Schwarz wrote:
>> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> Of course... BBv1 issues a warning and continue with the rest of the
>>> builds. For the top level build that warning is turned off as to not
>>> annoy the users.
>> I am sure this already has been noticed, but in case ...
>> Currently doing a bjam --v2 from the top level directory from boost tree
>> is not possible at all (at least on linux) due to this problems.
> Yes, that's why I've started this thread.
> Rene, do you think you can do something about that? I realise V2 was not
> acting like V1, and that's why I've tried to change Jamfile.v2, but it's not
> really good for our Linux users to have nothing building at all?
Well I'm not going to disable building static-runtime variants. Instead
I just fixed it so that it implements the BBv1 behavior, except for the
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
Boost-Build list run by bdawes at acm.org, david.abrahams at rcn.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk